Journal article
Digital Health, 2024
APA
Click to copy
Kandola, A., Edwards, K., Muller, M. A. E., Dührkoop, B., Hein, B., Straatman, J., & Hayes, J. (2024). Digitally managing depression: A fully remote randomised attention-placebo controlled trial. Digital Health.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Kandola, Aaron, Kyra Edwards, Marie AE Muller, Bettina Dührkoop, Bettina Hein, J. Straatman, and Joseph Hayes. “Digitally Managing Depression: A Fully Remote Randomised Attention-Placebo Controlled Trial.” Digital Health (2024).
MLA
Click to copy
Kandola, Aaron, et al. “Digitally Managing Depression: A Fully Remote Randomised Attention-Placebo Controlled Trial.” Digital Health, 2024.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{aaron2024a,
title = {Digitally managing depression: A fully remote randomised attention-placebo controlled trial},
year = {2024},
journal = {Digital Health},
author = {Kandola, Aaron and Edwards, Kyra and Muller, Marie AE and Dührkoop, Bettina and Hein, Bettina and Straatman, J. and Hayes, Joseph}
}
Background Depression is a common and disabling condition. Digital apps may augment or facilitate care, particularly in under-served populations. We tested the efficacy of juli, a digital self-management app for depression in a fully remote randomised controlled trial. Methods A pragmatic randomised controlled trial that included participants aged > 18 who self-identified as having depression and scored > 5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive juli for 8 weeks or a limited attention-placebo control app. Our primary outcome was the difference in Patient Health Questionnaire-8 scores at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were remission, minimal clinically important difference, worsening of depression, and health-related quality of life. Analyses were per-protocol (primary), and modified and full intention-to-treat (secondary). The trial was registered at ISRCTN (ISRCTN12329547). Results Between May 2021 and January 2023, we randomised 908 participants. 662 completed the week 2 outcome assessment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 456 completed the week 8 outcome assessments (per-protocol). In the per-protocol analysis, the juli group had a greater reduction in Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score (10.78, standard deviation 6.26) than the control group (11.88, standard deviation 5.73) by week 8 (baseline adjusted β-coefficient −0.94, 95% CI: −1.87 to −0.22, p = 0.045). Achieving remission and a minimal clinically important difference was more likely in the juli group at 8 weeks (adjusted odds ratios 2.22, 95% CI: 1.45–3.39, p < 0.001 and 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08–2.27, p = 0.018, respectively). There were no between-group differences in health-related quality of life or worsening of depression. Modified and full intention-to-treat analyses found similar results, but the primary outcome was non-significant. Conclusion The use of juli for 8 weeks resulted in a small reduction in symptoms of depression compared with an attention-placebo control. The juli app is a digital self-management tool that could increase the accessibility of evidence-based depression treatments.